My personal understanding of the fresh new Oppenheimer situation will come besides of my personal direct involvement on it, plus using my part for three ages as counsel on AEC’s Department off Defense and you may my personal personal personal relationship then and because up coming with high AEC safety officials
Kenneth D. Nichols, the AEC’s General Manager, needed to the Payment that Gray Board’s conclusions and you can recommendation out of May 27, 1954, getting recognized, plus the Fee towards Summer twenty-eight, 1954, given its four-to-one choice (Henry D. This new Oppenheimer case produced higher personal debate during the time, as well as the years might have been the topic of several instructions and posts. Very commentators enjoys interpreted the case as good vendetta towards element of Lewis L. Strauss, then-president of one’s AEC, or out-of army officials (usually the Sky Push) facing Oppenheimer based on identity and you will/otherwise coverage conflicts. The most recent research, by Jack Holl, one of several official historians of atomic times program try presented at American Historic Association’s general fulfilling within the December 1975.
Which evaluation could be considering considerable credence on account of brand new top-notch condition and you will integrity of one’s certified historians and because the fresh new membership lies in complete, uninhibited usage of AEC files. In short, the latest Holl membership disputes the view that the instance originated in a beneficial Strauss vendetta facing Oppenheimer. “Smyth dissented) up against repair off Oppenheimer’s approval” の続きを読む